If you want this blog to get up with great information:
Share & Follow us on facebook and be updated! http://www.facebook.com/shortcuttingblog
Share & Follow us on facebook and be updated! http://www.facebook.com/shortcuttingblog
Trader Joe's has become the latest firm
to be hit with a class action lawsuit alleging it "conceals" added sugar
by listing it on pack as "evaporated cane juice".
A lawsuit files by Pratt &
Associates-which sued Chobani on similar grounds last year-says Tader
Joe;s uses the term "evaporated cane juice" instead of the more accurate
terms "dried sugar cane syrup" or "sugar" on several private label
products from Greek-style yougurt to soy milk, despite the fact that the
Food & Drug Administration has repeatedly told firms not to use it.
Plaintiffs Amy Gitson, Christine Vodicka and Deborah Ross, all Bay Area
residents, sued because, according to the lawsuit, the "evaporated cane
juice" and "organic evaporated cane juice" listed as ingredients in
Trader Joe's brand yogurt and soy milk were actually just normal sugar.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has banned the term "evaporated cane juice" as a synonym for sugar on packaged foods, but the use of the term has become increasingly common over the past few years.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has banned the term "evaporated cane juice" as a synonym for sugar on packaged foods, but the use of the term has become increasingly common over the past few years.
The plaintiffs were misled by the defendant's use of the term "milk" in connection with its soy beverages.
The suit also accuses Trader Joe's of
falsely claiming that several of its products contain no artificial
flavors, ingredients or preservatives. The complaint cites the brand's
French Village Strawberry Nonfat Yogurt, which is tinted with beet
juice, and Dark Chocolate Peanut Butter Salted Caramel Truffles, which
contain one of a class of chemical preservatives called tocopherols, as
examples of mislabeled products.
Trader Joe's spokeswoman Alison Mochizuici told The Huffington Post the company cannot comment on pending litigation.
Gitson, Vodicka and Ross are asking the court to grant them, and similarly aggrieved parties across the country, monetary compensation for what they characterize as fraud on the part of Trader Joe's. They also want Trader Joe's to change its labels.
Trader Joe's spokeswoman Alison Mochizuici told The Huffington Post the company cannot comment on pending litigation.
Gitson, Vodicka and Ross are asking the court to grant them, and similarly aggrieved parties across the country, monetary compensation for what they characterize as fraud on the part of Trader Joe's. They also want Trader Joe's to change its labels.
They're represented by Pierce Gore, a
consumer affairs attorney who has been on a legal crusade against food
mislabeling since April 2012, when he filed nine lawsuits (on behalf of
different clients) based on erroneous labels. Over the past 11 months,
he's filed similar suits against 32 companies selling mislabeled foods,
including six of the 20 biggest food companies in the world:
Kraft, Nestle, Frito-Lay, Hershey's, Dole and ConAgra. Last August, The
New York Times retail reporter Stephanie Strom compared the campaign to
the war on tobacco companies in the mid-90s -- a war Gore
not-so-coincidentally helped wage.
Speaking by phone from his San Jose, Calif., law firm Pratt &
Associates, Gore told The Huffington Post that he started the fight
after looking into the FDA's regulations on packaged food labeling. He
said he figured out that a huge number of companies were in violation.
"The labeling on packaged food is just a sea of lies," he said. "It's difficult to describe the breadth of the problem. American consumers are being systematically lied to about the foods they eat."
Gore said he also quickly figured out that the FDA didn't have the resources to go after mislabelers. "We're trying to enforce laws for which there is no other enforcement mechanism," he said.
"The labeling on packaged food is just a sea of lies," he said. "It's difficult to describe the breadth of the problem. American consumers are being systematically lied to about the foods they eat."
Gore said he also quickly figured out that the FDA didn't have the resources to go after mislabelers. "We're trying to enforce laws for which there is no other enforcement mechanism," he said.
He also realized that the laws in
California, unlike those in many other states, allowed private
individuals to sue companies over false food-labeling claims. So he
started casting about for potential plaintiffs -- who weren't hard to
find in health-conscious San Francisco. (Many, including the plaintiffs
in the Trader Joe's case, are friends or acquaintances of lawyers at
Pratt & Associates.) California law doesn't require plaintiffs to
have been physically injured by a company to sue it; they need only to
prove "economic injury."
"We just have to prove that people didn't
get what they paid for. It is illegal to distribute, sell or even
possess misbranded food in California," Gore explained. "Our plaintiffs
bought products that weren't legal to sell."
Many of the suits, like the one against Trader Joe's, target companies' use of the term "evaporated cane juice." But others take aim at nebulous health claims like "no sugar added" and "all natural" which lend foods and beverages the air of healthfulness without signifying anything. In November, for example, one of Gore's clients sued Whole Foods for labeling its in-house brand 365 Everyday Value Cola as "all natural" even though it contains caramel flavoring, citric acid and carbon dioxide.
Many of the suits, like the one against Trader Joe's, target companies' use of the term "evaporated cane juice." But others take aim at nebulous health claims like "no sugar added" and "all natural" which lend foods and beverages the air of healthfulness without signifying anything. In November, for example, one of Gore's clients sued Whole Foods for labeling its in-house brand 365 Everyday Value Cola as "all natural" even though it contains caramel flavoring, citric acid and carbon dioxide.
In each of the 32 cases, Gore's
plaintiffs are asking to be compensated in the form of a partial or
total refund for the mislabeled products they bought. They are also
asking the companies being sued to change their labels. Gore said that
he'd noticed, over the past year, that several packaged food
manufacturers had removed the term "evaporated cane juice" from their
packages, which he chalked up to fear of a lawsuit.
None of the cases have been decided, but five of the defendants unsuccessfully filed motions to dismiss their suits.
"We haven't lost yet," he said. "And we're not going to, because the law is pretty clear. We allege not only consumer deception, but actual regulatory violations. That's the difference between us and previous labeling suits. It's a lot harder to research the regulation -- but we feel like we've built a better mousetrap."
None of the cases have been decided, but five of the defendants unsuccessfully filed motions to dismiss their suits.
"We haven't lost yet," he said. "And we're not going to, because the law is pretty clear. We allege not only consumer deception, but actual regulatory violations. That's the difference between us and previous labeling suits. It's a lot harder to research the regulation -- but we feel like we've built a better mousetrap."
Source:
www.huffingtonpost.com
http://worldtruth.tv
If you want this blog to get up with great information:
Share & Follow us on facebook and be updated! http://www.facebook.com/shortcuttingblog
Share & Follow us on facebook and be updated! http://www.facebook.com/shortcuttingblog
No comments:
Post a Comment